Ah, good ole Consumerism. We live to earn and buy. The joy of achievement and the never-ending supply of the next shiny new thing make life more exciting. However, in recent years, the world has gone far down the toilet, with the rich getting richer by the day while the middle class struggles to put bread on the table.
Most of us want to make the most of the limited amount of hard earned money. So when big companies decide to stop adding more product at the same or higher price, the public has questions, most of them starting with “What’s in the fuzzy-bedded Sky Daddy Bell Crenals?” running?”
Brazil decided to take a stand against Apple selling its phones without chargers to combat “deliberate discrimination” against consumers. However, is it all just a matter of money, profit and injustice, or did Apple have their reasons? Let’s dive into the details.
More information: Brazilian Ministry of Justice and Public Security
Brazil is taking a stand against Apple for selling its phones without chargers as a means of fighting “deliberate discrimination” against consumers.
Image credit: HS you (not original picture)
A decision, the first of its kind, was made last Tuesday in Brazil — the country banned the sale of iPhones and fined Apple 12.275 million reais ($2.38 million) because their boxes included chargers. were not
As reported. ReutersBrazil’s Ministry of Justice and Public Security (MJSP) considers it an inadequate product, arguing that the iPhone was being marketed without its essential components in “intentional discrimination” against consumers.
The decision to stop selling the phones comes after Brazil’s consumer protection agency (SENACON) opened a case in December last year, after Apple was sued for the same reason: selling phones without a charger, which is a There is a contract.
Apple has been fined 12.275 million reais ($2.38 million) for not including chargers in its boxes and is banned from selling phone models that don’t include them.
Image credit: Carlos Dambrance (not original photo)
A binding contract, as defined. Merriam Websteris often an illegal agreement by one party to sell a product or service on the condition that the buyer will also purchase another and different product or service from the same supplier.
“Bundling chargers, selling an incomplete product or lacking essential functionality, refusing to sell a complete product by discriminating against the consumer and shifting liability to third parties,” MJSP said in a statement. said in the statement. News for the newspaper. Thus, currently, Apple will not be able to sell iPhone 12 and later models in the country unless the charger is included.
Brazil’s Ministry of Justice and Public Security (MJSP) said, “Bundling chargers, selling an incomplete product or lacking essential functionality.”
Image credit: Toshiyuki IMAI (not original photo)
So what prompted Apple to release chargers in the first place? In 2020, the trillion-dollar company stopped including chargers with its phones, leaving consumers outraged. However, Apple argued that the move offered environmental benefits and was aimed at reducing its carbon footprint.
F. Cucchietti et al. More than a billion new mobile phones are sold annually, with about the same amount of old devices being discarded, contributing to e-waste. Old chargers, often incompatible with new phones, are also discarded, adding to the e-waste problem and increasing costs for the end user.
Image credit: Sean McEntee (not original photo)
Smart Company According to the report, there are approximately 4.78 billion mobile phone users worldwide (61.2 percent of the world’s population). And mobile phone chargers alone generate more than 51,000 tonnes of e-waste each year. Based on this, it would make sense if more tech consumers reuse phone chargers and if tech companies shift to standard charging sources to work across brands.
Brazilian officials rejected Apple’s argument that the practice was aimed at reducing carbon emissions, and said there was no evidence that selling smartphones without chargers provided environmental protection.
Tying is the illegal practice of selling a product or service on the condition that the buyer will also purchase other products from the same supplier.
Image credit: bfishadow (not original image)
In response, Apple announced that it would continue to work with SENACON to “address their concerns” but plans to appeal the decision. “We have already won several court decisions on this topic in Brazil and we believe that our customers are aware of the different options for charging and connecting their devices,” he said.
The long-term effects of this move could indicate a new trend to come, as many major companies, including Samsung and Google, are launching new devices without charging adapters.
This could be a big problem if more countries follow Brazil’s lead and start speaking up, which makes us question how much these companies are actually doing to reduce their environmental footprint. Going and removing chargers will really change nothing, other than make the common man spend more money on essential products.
Back in 2020, Apple stopped including chargers with its phones, aiming to reduce its carbon footprint and claiming it provided environmental benefits.
Image credit: Mike Mozart (not original photo)
KristenBellTattoos.com News recently covered the EU’s move to USB-C ports for all devices to reduce the need for multiple different chargers. This will come with a significant impact on iPhone models, which still use a Lightning cable, yet will negate the need for users to purchase different chargers for different devices.
People argue that switching to a universal USB-C charging standard would be a better way to reduce their environmental footprint, if that was indeed Apple’s goal. However, even with their new model, the iPhone 14, the move is still to come.
Some have called it a way to push consumers into buying wireless chargers, which raises a plethora of other concerns. Not only is it another form of charger, but it’s seen a lot. FutileConsumes about 47% more power than a normal cable. Globally, energy use is by far the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions from human activity, so we are by no means escaping.
Although Apple aims to be carbon neutral by 2030, that remains to be seen, especially when it comes to universal ports and energy-efficient wireless charging.
Image credit: Lucas Koster (not the original photo)
Apple has a goal of becoming carbon neutral by 2030, but that remains to be seen. Let us know your thoughts on it — do you think Brazil is right? Or is it a stark reminder that we are far from united in the cause of fighting climate change? Difficult topics make for interesting conversations, so sound off below!
Don’t forget to do Vote As it supports the author—hello, everyone!—and I wish you all a great day!
Many are debating the potential implications of Brazil’s decision. Let us know your thoughts in the comments!